Advanced members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

110 Excellent

About cobran20

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. So you've decided to open the thread again after, in true leftard fashion, closed it as no dissent is allowed. So what is so special about the fires: It has been hotter, fires have burnt larger areas and here is another example. Naturally it's Their ABC, in its ever left bias tried to tell us that it is all climate change and not arson. But then the truth cannot be suppressed forever: 716/1700 = 42.11% of fires investigated so far have been caused by arson ... and there we were told it was caused by globull warming.Yet Their ABC told us it was barely 1%. But it's Their ABC is not reporting the cold records being made around the world. The Electroverse site is tracking them. As I have posted earlier, the globull warming alarmist crowd have made forecasts for the last 30+ years, and proved to be false, which explains why the NOAA/IPCC,BOM/Others have been caught fudging the raw data to make their case and save face. As Armstrong likes to say, follow the money to find the truth. It is about the tax revenues from a carbon tax. The Canadian government introduced a carbon tax on its people in 2019 at $20.00 per tonne of CO2 and is set to rise to $50 a tonne by 2021. So far Armstrong's forecast is on the money. So feel free to shut the thread again, ban me altogether or in even more leftard fashion do both as well as delete this posting. Watch the elections. Like the Federal election in March, the silent majority has caught onto the BS. My money is on Trump to win again as the left and it's policies are clearly on the nose. I won't bother responding again as I don't bother with forums moderated to force the admin's outright bias.
  2. Antarctica Use to Have no Ice?
  3. Is Columbia University a known right wing publication? Otherwise that picture of Europe in 1741 shows a drought that is worse than today. Was that also caused by humans? Surely, there no cycle(s) that repeat over time!
  4. Firstly, I don't have to prove anything as I'm not an advocate of globull warming theory. All I'm doing to comparing their predictions based on the theory over the last 30-50 years versus the actuals and they've been wrong. Shame those scientists were not forced to bet their house on their predictions - nothing like skin in the game to make you accountable. As far as your chart, the article in the Australian from Marohassy is behind a paywall, so I can't paste the contents, but I've found other sites (here and here) that refer to it, with some lovely tables. I like this bit in particular: Once again, if you consider Marohassy to be an unqualified charlatan, then feel free to contact her and tell her as such. It should be easy for you to point the irrefutable facts from the settled science. Make sure you keep us posted on the exchange. Ditto for the NZ professor. I'm awaiting with great anticipation to your postings on those exchanges.
  5. Use Google translate this Norwegian, leftist publication SC. Then remember that it is July/summer in the Artic and the predictions they've made about the artic.
  6. Were you staring in front of the mirror when you came up with that thought?
  7. The bottom line is that all the d&g globull warming predictions are proving false. Live with it! Once again, if a pharma company homogenised its trial data to make it fit its expectations, it would be sued. If industry built manufacturing plants based on the level of accuracy of the science of globull warming, it would go bankrupt.
  8. What about Jennifer Marohasy? She is qualified and published peer-reviewed climate science journals. Perhaps you can argue with her that the BOM has not homogenised the data, including the hottest day. Do let us know!
  9. The Netherlands have always been a low land country. A lot of their land has been reclaimed from the sea, started before globull warming was even mentioned. They don't have dykes for nothing. So how are those doomsday globull warming predictions coming along? Here is a video with some nice historical perspective on those current hot temps in the northern hemisphere. I'm surprised the Dept of Settled Science has not homogenised the digitised old newspapers available on the web.
  10. There is a difference between prevention and actually happening. Have the levels risen at Fort Denison in any way over the last 100 years? as to the rest: BTW, have you contacted the NZ Professor yet to tell him he is wrong?
  11. Mr Snowflake having a cluster melt again?
  12. Was that using raw or homogenised data? I'm still awaiting explanation why we're get records in that 'ever disappearing' snow and cold temperatures as well, never mind that the Maldives haven't sunk. But one of the dissidents has a forecast about the extremes which I already posted here. Looking forward to the overall crop yields for this year! We'll see the effects of the 'F' word and that will not be consistent with globull warming theory. In the meantime, have a look at yet another classic prediction from the Dept of Settled Science & Associates. Refer page 7 in the WSJ Article (copy attached): I'll be heading that way next year. I'll let you know if I need a raft to get around. But so far, that forecast is dead wrong! WSJ130Final.pdf
  13. Is Inflation Inevitable?
  14. The Next Solar Cycle Begins in 2020 & May be a Panic Decline in Solar Activity